Answering a broken system

Non-court options to resolve family issues must be considered to avoid cases being left behind, says Linda Lamb 

08 Jul 2020

It would be easy to blame delays in the family court system on the paralytic effects of covid-19 but the root causes predate the virus by a number of years.

The rapid closure of courts and the centralisation of applications where staffing levels weren’t increased enough to cope; lengthy delays to receive hearing dates; the increasing number of lay party litigants following the cessation of legal aid – these all added to the woes which have been well documented and reported.

Before the outbreak, there had been talk of moving the system on digitally, but this was slow and the whiff of a suggestion of remote hearings quickly put down. What has happened as a result of covid-19 is remarkable. Lawyers were thrown into t...

Want to read on?

This article is part of our subscription-based access. Please pick one of the options below to continue.
Already registered? Login to access premium content

Single User

  • - 10 issues a year delivered to you
  • - Digital edition of the magazine
  • - Access to premium content
  • - Access to the SJ Archives
  • - Weekly email newsletter
  • - Access to the SJ community online
  • - Advanced search feature
  • - Online support
  • - Access to SJ app- coming soon!
  • - 6 special focuses per year
  • - Special offers on SJ and IICJ events

Corporate User

The Corporate IP Licence is tailored to your firm, making it the most cost effective way for the firm to access Solicitors Journal, and enables the firm to remain compliant with copyright and our Terms and Conditions. This gives you the ability to print and circulate articles within the firm.

To enquire about a Corporate IP Licence for your firm, please contact our Subscriptions Manager on